RUBY SPARKS (Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris, 2012)

ruby sparks

Starring: Paul Dano, Zoe Kazan, Annette Bening

You may like this if you liked: Stranger than Fiction (Marc Forster, 2006), The Science of Sleep (Michel Gondry, 2006), Little Miss Sunshine (Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris, 2006)

Calvin Weir-Fields (Dano) is a novelist whose debut novel that he wrote when 19 made him millions, however that was ten years ago and he has serious writers block. He also lives a lonely life with only his dog called Scotty for company. Calvin is also plagued by dreams where he always meets this woman that is basically perfect for him and everything he would want in a woman, who he refers to as Ruby. To cure his writers block, Calvin’s shrink advises him to simply write about Ruby and not worry about a novel for the time being. So, on his battered old typewriter Calvin starts to describe Ruby. However, one morning he comes down stairs to find the very same woman in his kitchen and they appear to be going out. What is even more unbelievable is that if he writes anything else about her on his typewriter this also becomes immediately true. Despite having the seemingly perfect girl, will it still prove to be a perfect relationship?

As this is only the second feature from the married double act that directed Little Miss Sunshine, there may well be obvious comparisons. Though Ruby Sparks is a quirky comedy at its core, this is where the similarity ends. Though there are some amusing moments, this is not a laugh out loud comedy. There are plenty of moments that give way to darker themes and some serious messages about relationships and coming to terms with our own faults. However even these tend to be skirted around and always there, but never examined in any real detail. That for me was the main problem with Ruby Sparks, though it was perfectly enjoyable and watchable, it was simply that and almost felt too afraid to take any risks. This was a slight disappointment considering there was potential here for there to be a Kaufman/Woody Allen real thought provoker. Maybe this was partly down to a fear of alienating too many demographics? Or maybe differences of opinion between the lead actress/screenwriter and the directors? Who Knows? This is the result.

Though this could be described as a ‘high concept’ comedy it always feels very safe and predictable. Unfortunately all the characters are a little too clichéd and feel that their characteristics fit almost too neatly into the plot developments. There is Paul Dano’s tortured and socially awkward writer, with his contrasting and opposite brother who is confident, hunky and successful (Chris Messina). Of course let us not forget his slightly mad parents and an arrogant English rival writer (Steve Coogan). Ruby herself is of course quirky and naive, but incredibly sweet and likeable.

Despite the ‘high concept’ of the narrative, it is all actually surprisingly predictable. I watched this film on a sunny afternoon and it felt perfect for that too, I am sorry to give it the old label of ‘enjoyable but forgettable’. In fact this film pretty much was a sunny afternoon in 90 minutes. Of course despite seemingly being perfect, Calvin still finds faults with Ruby and then when he changes them they well make things worse. This of course may be more a reflection on the faults of his personality, especially after a meeting with an ex and a very revealing conversation. These are interesting ideas on the human condition, but once again just skirt around the edges. There are all the usual character arcs, but once again you see them all coming a mile off leaving a rather empty experience by the end.

The saving grace of Ruby Sparks is the performances. Zoe Kazan brings enthusiasm and genuinely sweet naivety to the character of Ruby and Paul Dano is extremely likeable. Annette Bening and Antonio Bendaras bring the characters of his parents to live, and Chris Messina gives Calvin’s brother surprising heart. Zoe Kazan’s dialogue itself is good, the only problem is the story itself does not realise its own potential.

The heartfelt performances and genuinely good intentions make Ruby Sparks charming, watchable and good fun. However a lack of ambition or risk taking leaves a slightly flat and predictable experience. I also recommend watching on a sunny afternoon, just trust me on that one.

6/10

About MoodyB

An extremely passionate and (semi) opened minded film reviewer, with a hint of snobbish.
This entry was posted in All Film Reviews and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to RUBY SPARKS (Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris, 2012)

  1. The Vern says:

    Hello. I’m glad you liked the performances in this and am glad you noticed the darker themes. To me the movie never skittered around any issues. The idea to be able to control Ruby was appealing for Calvin at first, but he soon learns what a mistake it was. I felt it went into the issues of being able to control someone your dating pretty effectively I would put this up there as a Romantic Comedy if done by Rod Serling. I’m curious to find out what issues should they have delved more into. Look forward to reading more of your posts

    • MoodyB says:

      I agree that it did go into the issues of trying to control someone you are dating and that no one is perfect and has their faults, even if it is possible to control everything about them. All the morals about this were clear to see and I like to think that Calvin came to terms with who he is and therefore appreciated what it takes to be in a successful relationship. Perhaps this is more down to my cynical nature so may be a fault on my part; but I felt Calvin was a man with some serious issues and these were not examined in great detail in terms of causes and getting deep inside his subconscious. I appreciate that this would have however changed the tone of the film, maybe not for the better. I can’t quite pin point my finger on it, but I just felt there was something lacking in this film to make it really good. For me personally it was not funny enough, but also was not quite serious enough, maybe I let the cynical film student in me take over some times!

      Maybe I just found it a little predictable, I knew where it was going to go and what lessons were going to be learnt after twenty minutes. Perhaps I wanted it to surprise me and it just didn’t. This could well admittedly be a fault on my part.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s